Template / Design review

A design review template should clarify decisions before engineering takeover.

Good design reviews do not only collect comments. They make approval state, open questions, tradeoffs, and handoff readiness obvious so the next role can move confidently.

Review outcomes that are clearer than comment piles
Approval and open-question states that support handoff
A stronger bridge from design intent to implementation work

Product surface

Keep the workflow, docs, and ownership in one visible workspace.

Synaply 워크스페이스

프로젝트, 이슈, 워크플로, 문서가 하나의 공유 맥락에

^w G:2 g(BQ

현재 실행 면

크로스롤 릴리스 조율

방금 동기화됨
이슈담당상태연결 문서

원격 온보딩 릴리스

일이 움직여도 맥락은 계속 붙어 있습니다.

ENG리뷰 중출시 체크리스트

워크플로 인계 업데이트

일이 움직여도 맥락은 계속 붙어 있습니다.

PM명세 정렬 완료의사결정 메모

실행에 연결된 문서

일이 움직여도 맥락은 계속 붙어 있습니다.

OPS준비 완료운영 가이드

워크플로

명확한 인계 경로

1
프로덕트가 마일스톤과 순서를 정의합니다
2
디자인이 검토된 인계 패킷을 전달합니다
3
엔지니어링이 연결된 문서와 함께 출하합니다

맥락

문서와 업데이트가 계속 옆에 붙어 있습니다

문서 조각

출시 체크리스트, 리뷰 메모, 릴리스 결정은 채팅 기록 속으로 가라앉지 않고 일 옆에 계속 보입니다.

PM
DS
ENG
OPS
모든 역할이 공유

These pages should lead into a real product surface, not an abstract SEO shell. Synaply keeps projects, issues, workflows, and docs close enough that handoffs stay legible.

What this page is meant to help with

A design review exists to reduce ambiguity before work advances.

That means the template should surface whether the design is approved, what still needs input, what tradeoffs were accepted, and what engineering should treat as fixed versus flexible.

What the review should answer

A design review exists to reduce ambiguity before work advances.

That means the template should surface whether the design is approved, what still needs input, what tradeoffs were accepted, and what engineering should treat as fixed versus flexible.

Record the decision outcome, not just the discussion.
Capture unresolved questions with owners and follow-up paths.
Clarify where fidelity matters and where implementation can adapt.

How to connect review to handoff

A strong review leaves behind a transfer-ready summary.

Instead of asking engineering to infer the latest answer from comments, the review should produce a concise handoff package with the key acceptance context already organized.

Link the review outcome to the issue or project it affects.
Summarize scope changes or priority shifts clearly.
Attach any decision log entries created during the review.

How Synaply should reinforce the pattern

The review template becomes more valuable when it stays connected to execution.

Synaply should let the review sit near the workflow state, linked docs, and takeover owner so the transition into engineering feels like a continuation, not a restart.

Preserve review notes near the workflow item itself.
Use the review summary again inside digest or release communication.
Keep the handoff visible until implementation is truly underway.

Use this when

Use this page when your team needs to:

standardize design review across product, design, and engineering
capture approval state before engineering starts work
package open questions and tradeoffs into a better handoff
reduce “what changed after review?” confusion

Move from scattered follow-up to visible execution

Use review output to strengthen the next handoff.

A design review becomes far more useful when its result directly prepares the next owner to act instead of leaving them to reconstruct the context.